Contact us
Published:
18.1.2013
Last Updated:
19.11.2024

Case study: EU Court Makes Reference to the Sophistication of M

By
No items found.
what's inside

EU Court makes reference to sophistication of Malta’s gaming law

Full Article

In the course of criminal proceedings commenced against Jochen Dickinger and Franz Ömer, the Austrian Court requested a preliminary ruling from the European Court of Justice on the interpretation of Articles 43 EC and 49 EC (Article 49 and 56 TFEU).

A reference for a preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice (hereinafter EU Court) may be requested by courts of the European Union member states on questions raised in disputes brought before them about the interpretation of European Union law or the validity of a European Union Act. The EU Court does not decide the dispute itself but a decision rests with the national court or tribunal. The decision is similarly binding on other national courts or tribunals before which a similar issue is raised.

Mr Dickinger and Mr Ömer, who are Austrian nationals, are the founders of the multinational online games group bet-at-home.com. Criminal proceedings were brought against them alleging breach of national Austrian law. Mr Dickinger and Mr Ömer pleaded that national legislation ran against European Union legislation.

The Court concluded that EU law precludes the imposition of criminal penalties for infringement of a monopoly of operating games of chance laid down by the national law if the said legislation is not compatible with European Union law.

Furthermore, an EU country may institute monopolies with the objective of fighting crime and reducing opportunities for gambling if the legislation is based on finding that crime and fraud caused by gaming and addiction to it are a problem in the EU country concerned. The Court further concluded that the fact that an EU country has chosen a system of protection that differs from that adopted by another EU country cannot affect the assessment of the need for and proportionality of the relevant provisions.

Copyright © 2025 Chetcuti Cauchi. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking any action based on the contents of this document. Chetcuti Cauchi disclaims any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. Reproduction of reasonable portions of the content is permitted for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution is given and the content is not altered or presented in a false light.

key contacts
No items found.
continue learning
Contact us

Speak to a
recognised expert