Recent Maltese court proceedings involving a courier company shed light on employment law enforcement, arising from protests over courier working conditions. While regulators alleged unpaid wages and other breaches, the case ultimately underscored the need for concrete evidence, fair process, and robust employment practices nationwide.
Recent court proceedings involving a courier company in Malta have highlighted important aspects of employment law and its enforcement. The case centered on allegations that a fleet operator had breached various employment regulations, including failing to pay wages, withholding allowances, and not providing proper employment documentation. These accusations followed widespread protests by couriers working for delivery platforms, reflecting growing concerns about working conditions in the sector.
The Department for Industrial and Employment Relations (DIER) investigated claims of unpaid wages and other breaches, estimating that couriers across the industry were owed significant sums. However, when the case reached court, the prosecution was unable to present specific evidence directly linking the accused company to the alleged violations. In fact, the prosecution failed to submit evidence which showed that the company breached its obligations vis-a-vis its employees. In Malta, employers who fail to pay their employees’ wages may face criminal charges. In such cases, the prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court stressed that, in both criminal and administrative proceedings, clear and detailed evidence is required to secure a conviction. General industry problems or estimates are not enough; each employer’s conduct must be proven with concrete facts.
This judgment serves as a reminder that while authorities play a vital role in protecting workers, especially those who may be vulnerable or reluctant to come forward, employers are entitled to a fair process. Investigations must be thorough and targeted, and the rights of both workers and employers must be respected.
For businesses, this case underscores the importance of maintaining proper records, transparent employment practices, and clear communication with staff. For workers, it highlights the value of understanding their rights and the need for specific evidence when raising concerns.
Copyright © 2025 Chetcuti Cauchi. This document is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Professional legal advice should be obtained before taking any action based on the contents of this document. Chetcuti Cauchi disclaims any liability for actions taken based on the information provided. Reproduction of reasonable portions of the content is permitted for non-commercial purposes, provided proper attribution is given and the content is not altered or presented in a false light.
